Daniel Fluck

830 citations
50 papers · 701 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Fluck

49 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Daniel Fluck
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 611
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 143
  • Computational Mechanics 49
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 26
  • Ceramics and Composites 8
Replace Ángel Méndez with:
Ángel Méndez Spain
A.C. Large United Kingdom
Tuanjie Du China
Jacques M. Laniel Canada
Ruwei Zhao China
Zhaochen Cheng China
A. V. Pushkin Russia
Leonel P. Gonzalez United States
A. García-Navarro Spain
Shinji Higuchi Japan
Daniel Fluck relative to Ángel Méndez Spain Ángel Méndez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Ángel Méndez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Fluck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Fluck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Fluck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Fluck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Fluck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Fluck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Fluck. The network helps show where Daniel Fluck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Fluck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Fluck Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Fluck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199366
2 199143
3 199239
4 199138
5 199631
6 199230
7 200029
8 199225
9 199325
10 199121
11 199521
12 199820
13 199619
14 199018
15 199618
16 199516
17 199515
18 199114
19 199214
20 199514

About Daniel Fluck

Daniel Fluck is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Conservation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications and Materials Chemistry, having authored 50 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (48 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (3 papers), Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (1 paper), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (1 paper), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (1 paper), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (1 paper) and Advanced Data Storage Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (611 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (143 citations), Computational Mechanics (49 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (26 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (8 citations). Daniel Fluck has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Günter, Ch. Buchal, Tomáš Pliška, Martin Fleuster, Lutz Beckers, Dieter H. Jundt, Christoph Buchal, F. P. Strohkendl, Herbert Looser and Carlo Solcia. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Communications, Journal of Applied Physics, Electronics Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of the Optical Society of America B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact