Daniel E. Stuntz

702 citations
36 papers · 532 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Stuntz

34 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Stuntz
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Cell Biology 223
  • Pharmacology 169
  • Plant Science 381
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 171
  • Insect Science 47
Replace Nigel Fechner with:
Nigel Fechner Australia
Donald E. Munnecke United States
Sang‐Kuk Han South Korea
José Luis Manjón Spain
Taiga Kasuya Japan
Michael K. Ernst Germany
Yonglong Wang China
Carolina Barroetaveña Argentina
Abdul Razaq Pakistan
Jane Murdock Ulrich United States
Daniel E. Stuntz relative to Nigel Fechner Australia Nigel Fechner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Nigel Fechner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Stuntz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Stuntz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Stuntz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Stuntz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Stuntz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Stuntz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Stuntz. The network helps show where Daniel E. Stuntz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Stuntz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Stuntz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Stuntz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978115
2 197946
3 196234
4 198133
5 197429
6 197628
7 196925
8 197023
9 196922
10 198319
11 195916
12 197115
13 196913
14 196812
15 198912
16 196311
17 19688
18 19617
19 19757
20 19706

About Daniel E. Stuntz

Daniel E. Stuntz is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology and Oceanography, having authored 36 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (15 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (11 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (10 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (7 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (6 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (3 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (223 citations), Pharmacology (169 citations), Plant Science (381 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (171 citations) and Insect Science (47 citations). Daniel E. Stuntz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alexander H. Smith, David L. Largent, H Thiers, Roy Watling, David Gale Johnson, Helen S. Vishniac, John L. Maas, Damien R. Hall, Robert L. Shaffer and Ronald H. Petersen. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, Nature, Planta Medica, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact