Daniel E. Payne

720 citations
9 papers · 444 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Payne

9 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Payne
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 348
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 243
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 73
  • Signal Processing 41
  • Neurology 28
Replace Johannes Koren with:
Johannes Koren Austria
Mona Nasseri United States
Anouk Van de Vel Belgium
Shobi Sivathamboo Australia
Adriana Ulate-Campos Spain
Jay Pathmanathan United States
Rima El Atrache United States
Kris Cuppens Belgium
Evy Cleeren Belgium
Petr Klimeš Czechia
Daniel E. Payne relative to Johannes Koren Austria Johannes Koren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Johannes Koren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Payne. The network helps show where Daniel E. Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Payne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Payne Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Payne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2017191
2 202081
3 202158
4 202142
5 202022
6 202317
7 202216
8 201812
9 20245

About Daniel E. Payne

Daniel E. Payne is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1 paper), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (348 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (243 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (73 citations), Signal Processing (41 citations) and Neurology (28 citations). Daniel E. Payne has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dean R. Freestone, Mark Cook, David B. Grayden, Philippa J. Karoly, Ewan S. Nurse, Benjamin H. Brinkmann, Terence J. O’Brien, Thomas Carroll, Subhrajit Roy and Susmita Saha. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, EBioMedicine, Frontiers in Neurology, Annals of Neurology and EClinicalMedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact