Daniel Domine

36 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

Daniel Domine
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Analytical Chemistry 198
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 329
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 137
  • Spectroscopy 136
  • Geology 45
Replace Elisabete Furtado Dias with:
Elisabete Furtado Dias Portugal
David J. Veltkamp United States
Jamie Nuñez United States
Kjell Tjessem Norway
Armand Buchs Switzerland
Terje V. Karstang Norway
David W. P. Thomas United Kingdom
Matevž Pompe Slovenia
Manhoi Hur United States
István Hazai Hungary
Daniel Domine relative to Elisabete Furtado Dias Portugal Elisabete Furtado Dias's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×22.5×
Elisabete Furtado Dias · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Domine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Domine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Domine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Domine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Domine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Domine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Domine. The network helps show where Daniel Domine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Domine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Domine Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Domine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995189
2 199687
3 200361
4 201641
5 199338
6 199331
7 199729
8 199528
9 199927
10 199826
11 199418
12 199218
13 199716
14 199416
15 199815
16 199414
17 199612
18 199511
19 199811
20 199711

About Daniel Domine

Daniel Domine is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 36 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (18 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (15 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (10 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (4 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (3 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (198 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (329 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (137 citations), Spectroscopy (136 citations) and Geology (45 citations). Daniel Domine has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include James Devillers, Walter Karcher, S. Bintein, M. Chastrette, Hélène Budzinski, Mansi Anup Radke, P. Garrigues, Jacques Connan, Dennis J. Church and Cédric Merlot. Their work appears in journals such as SAR and QSAR in environmental research, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Polycyclic aromatic compounds, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Discovery Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact