Daniel Decker
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Environmental Education and Sustainability
Papers in
- Ecology 4
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 2
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 2
- Forest Management and Policy 1
- Co-authors
- Richard C. Stedman (1 shared paper)Ashley A. Dayer (1 shared paper)Lincoln R. Larson (1 shared paper)Daniela B. Raik (1 shared paper)Arthur L. Wilson (1 shared paper)John F. Organ (2 shared papers)W. Chris Wozencraft (1 shared paper)Shawn J. Riley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Mammalogy (1 paper)Journal of Wildlife Management (1 paper)Conservation Letters (1 paper)Society & Natural Resources (1 paper)JOT Journal für Oberflächentechnik (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Decker
9 papers receiving 594 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Ecological Modeling 86
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 147
- Ecology 304
- Global and Planetary Change 193
- Social Psychology 176
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Decker
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Decker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Decker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Decker. The network helps show where Daniel Decker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Decker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 183 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 144 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 109 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 93 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 86 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 9 | Hunting ethics, self-limitation, and the role of succinylcholine chloride in bow hunting | 1979 | 2 |
| 10 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 11 | Activities and Satisfactions of Fall Turkey Hunters in New York State | 2014 | 0 |
About Daniel Decker
Daniel Decker is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 11 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Forest Management and Policy (1 paper), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (86 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (147 citations), Ecology (304 citations), Global and Planetary Change (193 citations) and Social Psychology (176 citations). Daniel Decker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard C. Stedman, Ashley A. Dayer, Lincoln R. Larson, Daniela B. Raik, Arthur L. Wilson, John F. Organ, W. Chris Wozencraft, Shawn J. Riley, William F. Siemer and Len H. Carpenter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mammalogy, Journal of Wildlife Management, Conservation Letters, Society & Natural Resources and JOT Journal für Oberflächentechnik.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.