Daniel D. Oswald

11 papers receiving 173 citations

Peers

Daniel D. Oswald
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 31
  • Atmospheric Science 54
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 31
  • Earth-Surface Processes 17
  • Neurology 29
Replace W. R. Halliday with:
W. R. Halliday United States
M. Farina Italy
Allen J. Dennis United States
J.L. Granja-Bruña Spain
C. Pullinger United States
J. C. Stachnik United States
Machel Higgins United States
B. Hacker United States
Stavros Meletlidis Spain
Mohammad Faridi Iran
Daniel D. Oswald relative to W. R. Halliday United States W. R. Halliday's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
W. R. Halliday · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Oswald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Oswald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Oswald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Oswald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Oswald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Oswald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Oswald. The network helps show where Daniel D. Oswald may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel D. Oswald, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel D. Oswald Line = papers co-authored together Daniel D. Oswald links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 200270
2 202045
3 202128
4 202320
5 20157
6 20116
7
Two projections of timber supply in the Pacific coast states.
19753
8
Timber resource statistics for the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.
19612
9 20251
10 19861
11
The timber resources of Humboldt County, California.
19681

About Daniel D. Oswald

Daniel D. Oswald is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change and Infectious Diseases, having authored 11 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (1 paper), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (1 paper), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (1 paper) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (31 citations), Atmospheric Science (54 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (31 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (17 citations) and Neurology (29 citations). Daniel D. Oswald has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include André F. Lotter, Jacqueline F. N. van Leeuwen, Willem O. van der Knaap, Thomas Duning, T Barchfeld, Ulrich Hofstadt‐van Oy, Graham Wild, Thomas A. Schad, Bret Goodrich and Marleen J.A. Koel‐Simmelink. Their work appears in journals such as Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, Journal of Hydrology, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, Solar Physics and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact