Daniel Cletheroe
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
Papers in
-
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 4
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming 3
- Co-authors
- Hugh E. Williams (4 shared papers)Krzysztof Jóźwik (5 shared papers)Hitesh Ballani (6 shared papers)Paolo Costa (6 shared papers)Kai Shi (6 shared papers)Benn Charles Thomsen (5 shared papers)Istvan Haller (5 shared papers)Nicolas Villar (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature (2 papers)Human-Computer Interaction (2 papers)ACM Transactions on Storage (1 paper)Nature Electronics (1 paper)UCL Discovery (University College London) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Cletheroe
17 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Human-Computer Interaction 91
- Computer Science Applications 50
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 20
- Computer Networks and Communications 143
- Cognitive Neuroscience 86
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cletheroe
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cletheroe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cletheroe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cletheroe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cletheroe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cletheroe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cletheroe. The network helps show where Daniel Cletheroe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cletheroe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 146 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 6 | XFabric: a reconfigurable in-rack network for rack-scale computers | 2016 | 21 |
| 7 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2026 | 1 |
About Daniel Cletheroe
Daniel Cletheroe is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 18 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Network Technologies (5 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (4 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (3 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (3 papers), Cloud Data Security Solutions (2 papers) and Embedded Systems Design Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (91 citations), Computer Science Applications (50 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (20 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (143 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations). Daniel Cletheroe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hugh E. Williams, Krzysztof Jóźwik, Hitesh Ballani, Paolo Costa, Kai Shi, Benn Charles Thomsen, Istvan Haller, Nicolas Villar, Sophie Lange and Fotini Karinou. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Human-Computer Interaction, ACM Transactions on Storage, Nature Electronics and UCL Discovery (University College London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.