Daniel Clery

175 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Clery
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Small Animals 272
  • Parasitology 47
  • Computer Science Applications 36
  • Information Systems and Management 41
  • Geography, Planning and Development 29
Replace Chris J. Clarke with:
Chris J. Clarke United Kingdom
Kurt Henry Becker United States
Roman Frigg United Kingdom
John M. Hill United States
Mark Peplow United States
Scott A. Lathrop United States
Kelly Gaither United States
Eric B. Winsberg United States
Victor Hazlewood United States
Ann Bruce United Kingdom
Daniel Clery relative to Chris J. Clarke United Kingdom Chris J. Clarke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.8×
Chris J. Clarke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Clery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Clery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Clery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Clery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Clery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Clery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Clery. The network helps show where Daniel Clery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Clery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Clery Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Clery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 209 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996138
2 199974
3 201174
4 200555
5 200750
6 199439
7 199338
8 199835
9 199934
10 199934
11 200230
12 201122
13 202218
14 200517
15 199816
16 200615
17 200615
18 202114
19 202314
20 201513

About Daniel Clery

Daniel Clery is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Instrumentation, Information Systems and Management and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 209 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (35 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (26 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (19 papers), International Science and Diplomacy (18 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (18 papers), Space exploration and regulation (15 papers), Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies (14 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (272 citations), Parasitology (47 citations), Computer Science Applications (36 citations), Information Systems and Management (41 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (29 citations). Daniel Clery has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Grace M. Mulcahy, Paul Robert Torgerson, Julia Uppenbrink, Andrew Dowd, John P. Dalton, Stuart Andrews, Barbara R. Jasny, Phil Szuromi, James E. Austin and Brooks Hanson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Research in Veterinary Science, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Sustainable Production and Consumption and Veterinary Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact