Daniel Čierný

35 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Daniel Čierný
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 145
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 25
  • Neurology 20
  • Developmental Neuroscience 7
  • Immunology 36
Replace Torbjörn Åkerfeldt with:
Torbjörn Åkerfeldt Sweden
Keith Olsen United States
Lauren Phillips United States
Murat Kalaycı Türkiye
Peeter Kööbi Finland
Yücel Gönül Türkiye
Zhankui Wang China
Chen‐Fuh Lam Taiwan
Isuru Induruwa United Kingdom
Bartłomiej Kisiel Poland
Daniel Čierný relative to Torbjörn Åkerfeldt Sweden Torbjörn Åkerfeldt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Torbjörn Åkerfeldt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Čierný

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Čierný's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Čierný with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Čierný more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Čierný

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Čierný. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Čierný. The network helps show where Daniel Čierný may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Čierný, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Čierný Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Čierný links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201739
2 201832
3 201628
4 201726
5 201825
6 201420
7 201420
8 201019
9 201515
10 201614
11 201012
12 200911
13 202111
14 201911
15 201510
16 20188
17 20188
18 20157
19 20177
20 20215

About Daniel Čierný

Daniel Čierný is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Immunology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (13 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers), Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies (2 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (2 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (145 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (25 citations), Neurology (20 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (7 citations) and Immunology (36 citations). Daniel Čierný has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Austria and Croatia. Frequent co-authors include Egon Kurča, Ján Lehotský, Ema Kantorová, Štefan Sivák, Dušan Dobrota, Eva Baranovičová, Zdenko Killinger, Marián Grendár, Juraj Payer and Juraj Javor. Their work appears in journals such as Neurological Research, Physiological Research, Journal of Neuroimmunology, Journal of the Neurological Sciences and Life.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact