Daniel Chen

20 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Daniel Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Health 41
  • Transplantation 11
  • Oncology 106
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 80
  • Clinical Psychology 60
Replace Shi Yan with:
Shi Yan United States
Morgan Bonds United States
Lauren M. Theiss United States
Sean Burns United States
Catherine C. Motosko United States
Sarah Burkill Sweden
Norsarwany Mohamad Malaysia
Qiuming Shen China
Dorian J. Wilson United States
Tabitha Hendershot United States
Daniel Chen relative to Shi Yan United States Shi Yan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Shi Yan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Chen. The network helps show where Daniel Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Chen Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2011125
2 202098
3 201819
4 202116
5 202011
6 202011
7 202111
8 20089
9 20235
10
Sustainable Water Management and Technologies: Sustainable Water Management
20165
11 20214
12 20184
13 20254
14 20223
15 20203
16 20232
17 20241
18 20241
19 20201
20 20211

About Daniel Chen

Daniel Chen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (4 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (3 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (2 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (2 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (41 citations), Transplantation (11 citations), Oncology (106 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (80 citations) and Clinical Psychology (60 citations). Daniel Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Arjun K. Ghosh, John M. Walker, Avirup Guha, Claire Roddie, Joseph E. Schwartz, Robert Crupi, Elizabeth Brondolo, Melissa Pencille, Alan Roth and Leslie R. M. Hausmann. Their work appears in journals such as European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, American Journal of Nephrology, JACC CardioOncology, Frontiers in Psychiatry and Current Cardiology Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact