Daniel Cantré

475 citations
21 papers · 255 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Hepatology top 10%
    • Liver Disease and Transplantation
    • Liver physiology and pathology
  • Biochemistry top 10%
    • Sulfur Compounds in Biology

Papers in

Daniel Cantré

17 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

Daniel Cantré
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Hepatology 88
  • Biochemistry 51
  • Surgery 106
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 15
  • Epidemiology 74
Replace Nabil Mohsen with:
Nabil Mohsen Egypt
C Piasecki United Kingdom
Ayşe Canan Yazıcı Türkiye
Christiane Haeffele United States
Francesca Di Vece Italy
Octavian Istrătoaie Romania
Kazuhiro Takahashi Japan
Y. Kamiyama Japan
Kwanhoon Jo South Korea
Baptiste Maille France
Daniel Cantré relative to Nabil Mohsen Egypt Nabil Mohsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Nabil Mohsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cantré

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cantré's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cantré with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cantré more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cantré

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cantré. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cantré. The network helps show where Daniel Cantré may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cantré, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Cantré Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Cantré links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200861
2 201043
3 200832
4 202025
5 202023
6 200822
7 201914
8 20248
9 20187
10 20205
11 20224
12 20233
13 20233
14 20222
15 20231
16 20201
17 20231
18 20240
19 20250
20 20250

About Daniel Cantré

Daniel Cantré is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (4 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper) and Moyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (88 citations), Biochemistry (51 citations), Surgery (106 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (15 citations) and Epidemiology (74 citations). Daniel Cantré has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Christian Eipel, Brigitte Vollmar, Nikolai Siebert, Michael D. Menger, Kerstin Abshagen, Marc‐André Weber, Ebba Beller, Alper Öner, Hüseyin İnce and Felix G. Meinel. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Scientific Reports, Clinical Neurophysiology and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact