Daniel C. Williams

809 citations
42 papers · 556 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel C. Williams

42 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers

Daniel C. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Clinical Psychology 197
  • General Psychology 9
  • Applied Psychology 33
  • Family Practice 14
  • Social Psychology 112
Replace Barbara A. Munjas with:
Barbara A. Munjas United States
Michael Blumenfield United States
Meral Kelleci Türkiye
Barbara M. Sourkes United States
Asghar Dalvandi Iran
LeClair Bissell United States
Arthur C. Nielsen United States
Romy Mahrer Imhof Switzerland
Laurie Grubbs United States
Anne E. Belcher United States
Daniel C. Williams relative to Barbara A. Munjas United States Barbara A. Munjas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Barbara A. Munjas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Williams. The network helps show where Daniel C. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200662
2
Do the attitudes and beliefs of young teenagers towards general practice influence actual consultation behaviour?
200054
3 201340
4 200532
5 200730
6 201328
7 201827
8 201025
9 202125
10 201824
11 200816
12 201615
13 198114
14 202213
15 201412
16 201512
17 201810
18 201910
19 198010
20 197910

About Daniel C. Williams

Daniel C. Williams is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Physiology and Epidemiology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (197 citations), General Psychology (9 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations), Family Practice (14 citations) and Social Psychology (112 citations). Daniel C. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Heidi M. Levitt, David Mills, Joseph V. Dobson, Ronald E. Shor, Robert A. Neimeyer, Ronald J. Teufel, Dick Churchill, Susan Denman, Julie A. Schumacher and Jessica Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Hospital Pediatrics, Psychotherapy Research, Pediatric Emergency Care, Addictive Behaviors and The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact