Daniel Brudney
Impact in
- Molecular Medicine top 5%
- Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Papers in
-
- Ethics in medical practice 12
-
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 5
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 4
- Co-authors
- John D. Lantos (2 shared papers)D Sompolinsky (1 shared paper)David M. Livermore (1 shared paper)N. Woodford (1 shared paper)Shiri Navon‐Venezia (1 shared paper)Mary E. Kaufmann (1 shared paper)Jian Zhang (1 shared paper)M. Warner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Hastings Center Report (5 papers)Political Theory (3 papers)Law and Philosophy (2 papers)PEDIATRICS (2 papers)The American Journal of Bioethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
Daniel Brudney
26 papers receiving 306 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Molecular Medicine 110
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 26
- Endocrinology 37
- Philosophy 47
- Clinical Biochemistry 25
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Brudney
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Brudney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Brudney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Brudney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Brudney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Brudney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Brudney. The network helps show where Daniel Brudney may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Brudney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 116 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 63 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 14 | A Justifiable Asymmetry. | 2015 | 4 |
| 15 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 2 |
About Daniel Brudney
Daniel Brudney is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (12 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (7 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Joseph Conrad and Literature (2 papers) and Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (110 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (26 citations), Endocrinology (37 citations), Philosophy (47 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (25 citations). Daniel Brudney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include John D. Lantos, D Sompolinsky, David M. Livermore, N. Woodford, Shiri Navon‐Venezia, Mary E. Kaufmann, Jian Zhang, M. Warner, Mark Siegler and Ludwig Siep. Their work appears in journals such as The Hastings Center Report, Political Theory, Law and Philosophy, PEDIATRICS and The American Journal of Bioethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.