Daniel Boulter

668 citations
34 papers · 324 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Boulter

33 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Daniel Boulter
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 135
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 72
  • Hepatology 28
  • Neurology 53
  • Genetics 30
Replace Ravinder‐Jeet Singh with:
Ravinder‐Jeet Singh India
Jeffrey M. Boorstein United States
Banu Yağmurlu Türkiye
Soumya Mukherjee United Kingdom
Katharine Hopkins United States
Sedat Işık Türkiye
Daniel Konda Italy
Monique A. Mogensen United States
Emir Şilit Türkiye
Eric C Leuthardt United States
Daniel Boulter relative to Ravinder‐Jeet Singh India Ravinder‐Jeet Singh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ravinder‐Jeet Singh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Boulter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Boulter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Boulter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Boulter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Boulter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Boulter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Boulter. The network helps show where Daniel Boulter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Boulter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Boulter Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Boulter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201640
2 202034
3 201733
4 201123
5 202220
6 201818
7 201117
8 201917
9 202015
10 201011
11 20239
12 20149
13 20218
14 20237
15 20077
16 20226
17 20136
18 20136
19 20216
20 20116

About Daniel Boulter

Daniel Boulter is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 34 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (10 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (7 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (6 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (4 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (135 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (72 citations), Hepatology (28 citations), Neurology (53 citations) and Genetics (30 citations). Daniel Boulter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andrew D. Hardie, Pamela W. Schaefer, Xuan V. Nguyen, Luciano M. Prevedello, Maria J. Borja, Eric C. Bourekas, Ehud Mendel, Joshua D. Palmer, Michael N. Hoff and Bruce R. Rosen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of the American College of Radiology, Neurosurgery, Journal of Neuroimaging and Biomedicines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact