Daniel Borja–Cacho

46 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Daniel Borja–Cacho
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 360
  • Drug Discovery 5
  • Hepatology 147
  • Oncology 218
  • Surgery 262
Replace Lizhu Lin with:
Lizhu Lin China
Quangen Gao China
Baojin Hua China
Cheng Hu China
Weiping Yang China
Chinenye Iwuji United Kingdom
Nan Yao China
Yuzhen Zhuo China
Quanxing Wang China
Daniel Borja–Cacho relative to Lizhu Lin China Lizhu Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.4×
Lizhu Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Borja–Cacho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Borja–Cacho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Borja–Cacho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Borja–Cacho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Borja–Cacho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Borja–Cacho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Borja–Cacho. The network helps show where Daniel Borja–Cacho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Borja–Cacho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Borja–Cacho Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Borja–Cacho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007273
2 2010153
3 2011142
4 200999
5 202193
6 202084
7 200981
8 200965
9 201051
10 202351
11 201049
12 200846
13 202345
14 200939
15 201031
16 202216
17 200912
18 201912
19 202312
20 200611

About Daniel Borja–Cacho

Daniel Borja–Cacho is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Surgery, Hepatology, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (12 papers), Heat shock proteins research (8 papers), Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment (8 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (4 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (3 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (360 citations), Drug Discovery (5 citations), Hepatology (147 citations), Oncology (218 citations) and Surgery (262 citations). Daniel Borja–Cacho has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Selwyn Maurice Vickers, Ashok Kumar Saluja, Vikas Dudeja, Phoebe A. Phillips, Rajinder Kumar Dawra, Rohit Chugh, Veena Sangwan, Mara B. Antonoff, William E. Grizzle and Joshua A. McCarroll. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Surgical Research, Pancreas, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Gastroenterology and Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact