Daniel Beck

35 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Daniel Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Ecological Modeling 116
  • Global and Planetary Change 355
  • Communication 101
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 238
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 102
Replace Leigh A. Nelson with:
Leigh A. Nelson Australia
Fábio A. Machado Brazil
John Gould Australia
Jan Vermeer United States
Jenny Rock New Zealand
Flavia Montaño‐Centellas United States
John C. Mittermeier United Kingdom
Shawan Chowdhury Australia
Charlotte Hawkins United Kingdom
Marina Golivets Germany
Daniel Beck relative to Leigh A. Nelson Australia Leigh A. Nelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.1×
Leigh A. Nelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Beck. The network helps show where Daniel Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Beck Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199570
2 200365
3 201964
4 199050
5 199145
6 200933
7 199632
8 201827
9 201326
10 199425
11 199525
12
Sports and Media
200319
13 200718
14 201118
15
Factual Entertainment and Reality TV
201216
16 199116
17 200812
18 200211
19 20188
20
Zwischen Sanktionierung und Dialog : die Durchsetzung von Good Governance in der Entwicklungspartnerschaft von EU und AKP
20048

About Daniel Beck

Daniel Beck is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Communication, having authored 38 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (16 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Media Studies and Communication (8 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (4 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (116 citations), Global and Planetary Change (355 citations), Communication (101 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (238 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (102 citations). Daniel Beck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Randy D. Jennings, Charles H. Lowe, C. M. Gienger, Lea Hellmueller, Gordon W. Schuett, C. H. Lowe, Aurelio Ramı́rez-Bautista, Marlis R. Douglas, Brian K. Sullivan and Michael E. Douglas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Herpetology, Journalism, Copeia, Canadian Journal of Zoology and Herpetologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact