Daniel Beck

31 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers

Daniel Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ecological Modeling 113
  • Global and Planetary Change 346
  • Communication 96
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 228
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 98
Replace Maria Novosolov with:
Maria Novosolov Israel
Leigh A. Nelson Australia
Fábio A. Machado Brazil
Jan Vermeer United States
Flavia Montaño‐Centellas United States
John C. Mittermeier United Kingdom
Charlotte Hawkins United Kingdom
Bryan S. McLean United States
Claudia A. Medina Colombia
Shem Unger United States
Daniel Beck relative to Maria Novosolov Israel Maria Novosolov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.6×
Maria Novosolov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Beck. The network helps show where Daniel Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Beck Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199568
2 200363
3 201961
4 199047
5 199143
6 200933
7 199632
8 201826
9 201324
10 199524
11 199421
12 200718
13 201117
14
Sports and Media
200316
15
Factual Entertainment and Reality TV
201215
16 199113
17 200812
18 200211
19 20188
20
Zwischen Sanktionierung und Dialog : die Durchsetzung von Good Governance in der Entwicklungspartnerschaft von EU und AKP
20047

About Daniel Beck

Daniel Beck is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 32 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (15 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (4 papers) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (113 citations), Global and Planetary Change (346 citations), Communication (96 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (228 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (98 citations). Daniel Beck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Randy D. Jennings, Charles H. Lowe, C. M. Gienger, Lea Hellmueller, Gordon W. Schuett, Aurelio Ramírez‐Bautista, C. H. Lowe, Brian K. Sullivan, Marlis R. Douglas and Michael E. Douglas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Herpetology, Journalism, Canadian Journal of Zoology, Copeia and Herpetologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact