Daniel Bailey
Impact in
- Finance top 10%
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Papers in
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 4
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 2
- European Union Policy and Governance 2
- Finance 6
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 6
- Co-authors
- Matthew Wood (1 shared paper)Robert S. Seitz (5 shared papers)David R. Hout (4 shared papers)Brian Z. Ring (3 shared papers)Brock L. Schweitzer (3 shared papers)Stephan W. Morris (2 shared papers)Brian D. Lehmann (1 shared paper)Jennifer A. Pietenpol (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Political Economy (2 papers)British Politics (2 papers)Competition & Change (2 papers)Value in Health (1 paper)Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Daniel Bailey
16 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Finance 47
- Cancer Research 46
- Oncology 83
- Political Science and International Relations 71
- Urban Studies 16
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bailey
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bailey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bailey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bailey. The network helps show where Daniel Bailey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 |
About Daniel Bailey
Daniel Bailey is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Strategy and Management, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (6 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (4 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (4 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (2 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (47 citations), Cancer Research (46 citations), Oncology (83 citations), Political Science and International Relations (71 citations) and Urban Studies (16 citations). Daniel Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Wood, Robert S. Seitz, David R. Hout, Brian Z. Ring, Brock L. Schweitzer, Stephan W. Morris, Brian D. Lehmann, Jennifer A. Pietenpol, Naoto T. Ueno and Colin Hay. Their work appears in journals such as New Political Economy, British Politics, Competition & Change, Value in Health and Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.