Daniel B. Stone

1.7k citations
51 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel B. Stone

45 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel B. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 305
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 305
  • Physiology 323
  • Surgery 404
  • Biochemistry 53
Replace G. P. Crean with:
G. P. Crean United Kingdom
Charles D. Gerson United States
Albert I. Mendeloff United States
Platon Jack Collipp United States
Daniel Lemonnier France
Boyd R. Switzer United States
J. F. Brock South Africa
Jan Stephen Redfern United States
Bennie P. M. Bloemberg Netherlands
Lisa Sanders United States
Daniel B. Stone relative to G. P. Crean United Kingdom G. P. Crean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
G. P. Crean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel B. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel B. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel B. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel B. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel B. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel B. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel B. Stone. The network helps show where Daniel B. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel B. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel B. Stone Line = papers co-authored together Daniel B. Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969254
2 1964185
3 1989123
4 1963119
5 1967100
6 196371
7 196168
8 196562
9
Serum glucose, insulin, and growth hormone in chronic hepatic cirrhosis.
196960
10 196257
11 196228
12 196919
13 197218
14 196918
15 196618
16 196717
17 196317
18 196316
19 196114
20 196811

About Daniel B. Stone

Daniel B. Stone is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (8 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (6 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (305 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (305 citations), Physiology (323 citations), Surgery (404 citations) and Biochemistry (53 citations). Daniel B. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William E. Connor, Mark L. Armstrong, Donald T. Witiak, Robert E. Hodges, Joseph D. Brown, Willard A. Krehl, R.E. Hodges, Richard D. Eckhardt, Naguib A. Samaan and David R. Soll. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes, Metabolism, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Experimental Biology and Medicine and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact