Daniel A. Velez

14 papers receiving 474 citations

Peers

Daniel A. Velez
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Developmental Neuroscience 62
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 237
  • Emergency Medicine 80
  • Physiology 25
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 100
Replace Ahmar Ayub with:
Ahmar Ayub United States
Marcos Poncelas Spain
M. Kitakaze Japan
Michel Ovize France
Russell S. Ronson United States
Andre Terzic United States
Elisabeth Couture-Lepetit France
Kazuyuki Naitoh Japan
Maki Katamura Japan
En Takashi Japan
Daniel A. Velez relative to Ahmar Ayub United States Ahmar Ayub's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Ahmar Ayub · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Velez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Velez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Velez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Velez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Velez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Velez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Velez. The network helps show where Daniel A. Velez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Velez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel A. Velez Line = papers co-authored together Daniel A. Velez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2001164
2 200089
3 200181
4 200023
5 200122
6 200317
7 200317
8 200116
9 200415
10 200115
11 200011
12 20005
13 20034
14 20011
15 20250

About Daniel A. Velez

Daniel A. Velez is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (7 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (1 paper) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (62 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (237 citations), Emergency Medicine (80 citations), Physiology (25 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (100 citations). Daniel A. Velez has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Guyton, Ning-Ping Wang, Jakob Vinten‐Johansen, Zhi‐Qing Zhao, Karlene Hewan‐Lowe, Masanori Nakamura, Jason M. Budde, Cullen D. Morris, Satoshi Muraki and Zhiqing Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research and Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact