Daniel A. Isermann

79 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Daniel A. Isermann
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.1k
  • Aquatic Science 607
  • Global and Planetary Change 695
  • Ecology 444
  • Ecological Modeling 25
Replace Nídia Noemi Fabré with:
Nídia Noemi Fabré Brazil
Patrick M. Kočovský United States
Paul Brown Australia
Christopher S. Vandergoot United States
Michael H. Hoff United States
Randall M. Claramunt United States
David G. Fielder United States
Steven W. Hewett United States
Phillip W. Bettoli United States
Mark A. Pegg United States
Daniel A. Isermann relative to Nídia Noemi Fabré Brazil Nídia Noemi Fabré's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nídia Noemi Fabré · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Isermann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Isermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Isermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Isermann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Isermann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Isermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Isermann. The network helps show where Daniel A. Isermann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Isermann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel A. Isermann Line = papers co-authored together Daniel A. Isermann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007123
2 201799
3 200577
4 200368
5 200541
6 200239
7 200234
8 200734
9 201634
10 201733
11 200833
12 202232
13 201632
14 201731
15 200726
16 200425
17 200223
18 202019
19 201319
20 202218

About Daniel A. Isermann

Daniel A. Isermann is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (82 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (47 papers), Marine and fisheries research (46 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (17 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (6 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (5 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.1k citations), Aquatic Science (607 citations), Global and Planetary Change (695 citations), Ecology (444 citations) and Ecological Modeling (25 citations). Daniel A. Isermann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David W. Willis, Carey T. Knight, David O. Lucchesi, Phillip W. Bettoli, Steven M. Sammons, Greg G. Sass, Brian L. Sloss, Brian G. Blackwell, Jonathan F. Hansen and Derek H. Ogle. Their work appears in journals such as North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Journal of Great Lakes Research, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences and Evolutionary Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact