Daniel A. Gundersen

58 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel A. Gundersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Applied Psychology 84
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 65
  • General Health Professions 311
  • Physiology 313
  • Health 94
Replace Jean K. Brown with:
Jean K. Brown United States
Jong Park South Korea
Heidi Turon Australia
Wonshik Chee United States
Chorong Park United States
Maya Shaha Switzerland
Simon Cohn United Kingdom
Kate M. Gunn Australia
Alison Brettle United Kingdom
Teresa Finlay United Kingdom
Daniel A. Gundersen relative to Jean K. Brown United States Jean K. Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Jean K. Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Gundersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Gundersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Gundersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Gundersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Gundersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Gundersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Gundersen. The network helps show where Daniel A. Gundersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Gundersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel A. Gundersen Line = papers co-authored together Daniel A. Gundersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020181
2 201192
3 200975
4 201873
5 201662
6 201848
7 200739
8 201736
9 201336
10 201435
11 201435
12 201630
13 201727
14 201526
15 202125
16 201922
17 201621
18 201621
19 201917
20 201314

About Daniel A. Gundersen

Daniel A. Gundersen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (15 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (7 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (6 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (6 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (84 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (65 citations), General Health Professions (311 citations), Physiology (313 citations) and Health (94 citations). Daniel A. Gundersen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cristine D. Delnevo, Sandra E. Echeverría, Michael Steinberg, Olivia A Wackowski, Michelle T. Bover Manderski, Meghan Underhill‐Blazey, James A. Tulsky, Fangxin Hong, Rachel Pozzar and Alexi A. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Epidemiology, JAMA Network Open, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact