Daniel A. Devcich

13 papers receiving 750 citations

Peers

Daniel A. Devcich
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Family Practice 15
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Emergency Medical Services 40
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 70
  • Clinical Psychology 92
Replace Alessandra N. Bazzano with:
Alessandra N. Bazzano United States
Alison Ballantyne Australia
Carmina Wanden-Berghe Spain
Dianne P. Reidlinger Australia
David J. Mingay United States
Laura S. Sims United States
Yujeong Kim South Korea
Kerith Duncanson Australia
Daniel M. Blumenthal United States
Tahereh Dehdari Iran
Daniel A. Devcich relative to Alessandra N. Bazzano United States Alessandra N. Bazzano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Alessandra N. Bazzano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Devcich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Devcich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Devcich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Devcich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Devcich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Devcich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Devcich. The network helps show where Daniel A. Devcich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Devcich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel A. Devcich Line = papers co-authored together Daniel A. Devcich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2007358
2 2006174
3 201377
4 201736
5 201632
6 201530
7 200824
8 201520
9 202117
10 201114
11 20148
12 20136
13
Is refractory angina pectoris a form of chronic pain? A comparison of two patient groups receiving spinal cord stimulation therapy.
20143

About Daniel A. Devcich

Daniel A. Devcich is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Emergency Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 799 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (15 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Emergency Medical Services (40 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (70 citations) and Clinical Psychology (92 citations). Daniel A. Devcich has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Keith J. Petrie, Christopher J. Ellis, Elizabeth Broadbent, Alan Merry, Greg Gamble, Simon J Mitchell, Christine M. Rubie‐Davies, Jacqueline A. Hannam, Jennifer Weller and David Cumin. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Quality & Safety, BMJ Open, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Anaesthesia and British Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact