Danfeng Peng

606 citations
36 papers · 431 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 7
    • Diabetes and associated disorders 2
    • Pancreatic function and diabetes 7

Danfeng Peng

35 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Danfeng Peng
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Nephrology 73
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 83
  • Physiology 75
  • Ophthalmology 24
  • Genetics 65
Replace Xiaoming Tao with:
Xiaoming Tao China
Luis Concepcion United States
Kristina Blaslov Croatia
Wing‐Sun Chow Hong Kong
Taiya Kato Japan
Eisaku Matsumoto Japan
Toshihide Shike Japan
Sun Ha Lee South Korea
Chiara Montemurro United States
Danfeng Peng relative to Xiaoming Tao China Xiaoming Tao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Xiaoming Tao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danfeng Peng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danfeng Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danfeng Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danfeng Peng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danfeng Peng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danfeng Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danfeng Peng. The network helps show where Danfeng Peng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danfeng Peng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danfeng Peng Line = papers co-authored together Danfeng Peng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201648
2 201636
3 201527
4 201527
5 201521
6 201621
7 201620
8 201719
9 201418
10 201416
11 201415
12 201514
13 201413
14 201712
15 201712
16 201412
17 201512
18 202311
19 20159
20 20229

About Danfeng Peng

Danfeng Peng is a scholar working on Genetics, Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Molecular Biology and Nephrology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (7 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (7 papers), Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (4 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (4 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (73 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (83 citations), Physiology (75 citations), Ophthalmology (24 citations) and Genetics (65 citations). Danfeng Peng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Weiping Jia, Cheng Hu, Yuqian Bao, Jing Yan, Feng Jiang, Miao Chen, Shiyun Wang, Xue Sun, Shanshan Tang and Dandan Yan. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, BioMed Research International, Diabetic Medicine, PLoS ONE and Diabetologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact