Dana Roth

17 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

Dana Roth
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Clinical Psychology 234
  • Occupational Therapy 24
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 67
  • Safety Research 32
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
Replace Thomas L. Boehm with:
Thomas L. Boehm United States
Nada Murphy Australia
Fiona Rillotta Australia
M. Begoña Orgaz Spain
Tess Bennett United States
Ann Turnbull United States
Jennifer McDonald United States
Roula Markoulakis Canada
Matías Irarrázaval Chile
Aquilino. Polaino-Lorente Spain
Dana Roth relative to Thomas L. Boehm United States Thomas L. Boehm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Thomas L. Boehm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Roth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Roth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Roth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Roth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Roth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Roth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Roth. The network helps show where Dana Roth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Dana Roth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Roth Line = papers co-authored together Dana Roth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2007109
2 199773
3
Family Quality of Life Survey: Main caregivers of people with intellectual or developmental disabilities.
200665
4 201133
5 201632
6 200831
7 201223
8 201521
9 201118
10 201611
11
The Effect of Lighting on the Behavior of Children Who Are Developmentally Disabled.
200110
12 20129
13 20199
14 20075
15 20235
16
What Do the Parents Say? Parents of Children with Developmental Disabilities Using Touch-Screen Mobile Devices
20155
17 20231
18 20250

About Dana Roth

Dana Roth is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Safety Research and Surgery, having authored 18 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper) and Disability Education and Employment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (234 citations), Occupational Therapy (24 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (67 citations), Safety Research (32 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations). Dana Roth has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Shigehiro Oishi, Shimshon Neikrug, Ivan Brown, Nehama Baum, Mian Wang, Barry Isaacs, Roy I. Brown, Manfred S. Green, Shula Parush and Shirli Werner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Research in Developmental Disabilities, Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy and Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact