Dana Ferrin Sutton

443 citations
30 papers · 122 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History

Papers in

Dana Ferrin Sutton

19 papers receiving 68 citations

Peers

Dana Ferrin Sutton
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Anthropology 83
  • Archeology 45
  • Classics 14
  • General Arts and Humanities 4
  • Philosophy 24
Replace William H. Race with:
William H. Race United States
R.O.A.M. Lyne
Eva Stehle United States
Eduard Fraenkel
B. P. Reardon France
F. H. Sandbach
E. N. Tigerstedt Sweden
Louis Gernet
Anthony T. Edwards
Louise Pratt United States
Dana Ferrin Sutton relative to William H. Race United States William H. Race's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
William H. Race · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Ferrin Sutton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Ferrin Sutton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Ferrin Sutton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Ferrin Sutton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Ferrin Sutton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Ferrin Sutton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Ferrin Sutton. The network helps show where Dana Ferrin Sutton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Dana Ferrin Sutton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Ferrin Sutton Line = papers co-authored together Dana Ferrin Sutton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Greek satyr play
198020
2 198615
3
The Lost Sophocles
198414
4 19788
5
The Catharsis of Comedy
19948
6 19816
7 19836
8
Two Lost Plays of Euripides
19876
9 19876
10 19855
11 19745
12 19764
13 19773
14 19913
15 19842
16 19742
17 20102
18 19792
19
Evidence for Lost Dramatic Hypotheses
20041
20
The Date of Prometheus Bound
19831

About Dana Ferrin Sutton

Dana Ferrin Sutton is a scholar working on Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory, Archeology, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 30 papers that have together received 122 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (14 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Families in Therapy and Culture (2 papers), Turkish Literature and Culture (2 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper), Early Modern Women Writers (1 paper) and Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (83 citations), Archeology (45 citations), Classics (14 citations), General Arts and Humanities (4 citations) and Philosophy (24 citations). Dana Ferrin Sutton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include F. H. Sandbach, Justina Gregory, John Herington, Charles Rowan Beye and Walter Donlan. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, The American Journal of Philology, The Classical Quarterly, Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies and Phoenix.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact