Dan Wei

1.4k citations
120 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Wei

115 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Dan Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 561
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 605
  • Condensed Matter Physics 139
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 108
  • Computer Networks and Communications 141
Replace Neil Goldsman with:
Neil Goldsman United States
Zhengji Xu Singapore
Marc Serra‐Garcia Switzerland
Feng Wen China
Y. Nakamura Japan
Duane Karns United States
K. Miura Japan
P.A. Rolland France
J. Lenz United States
Yueke Wang China
Dan Wei relative to Neil Goldsman United States Neil Goldsman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Neil Goldsman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Wei. The network helps show where Dan Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Wei Line = papers co-authored together Dan Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199364
2 202064
3 201461
4 201260
5 201850
6 202150
7 202241
8 200927
9 200727
10 201727
11 200725
12 199422
13 201321
14 201821
15 201120
16 201020
17 202220
18 201419
19 201219
20 201518

About Dan Wei

Dan Wei is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 120 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (79 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (55 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (21 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (16 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (14 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (9 papers) and Copper Interconnects and Reliability (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (561 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (605 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (139 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (108 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (141 citations). Dan Wei has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Wu‐Hua Chen, Xiaomei Lu, Fulin Wei, Qiuyu Zhang, Jian Wei, Xingfeng Lei, Mingtao Qiao, Kai-Zhong Gao, Wei Xing Zheng and Feng Tian. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, IEICE Transactions on Electronics and AIP Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact