Dan Taylor

1.0k citations
30 papers · 687 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Taylor

29 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers

Dan Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Developmental Neuroscience 92
  • Nephrology 90
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 178
  • Ophthalmology 47
  • Genetics 153
Replace Isabella Moore with:
Isabella Moore United Kingdom
Maria Badaracco United States
Giacomo Brisca Italy
Benno Schlesinger United States
Shintaro Mori Japan
Jae Ho Kim United States
Jonathan A. White United States
Ertuğrul Tatlısumak Türkiye
Jan G. Post Netherlands
Marie‐Dominique Piercecchi France
Dan Taylor relative to Isabella Moore United Kingdom Isabella Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Isabella Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Taylor. The network helps show where Dan Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Dan Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998264
2 200176
3 200451
4
Choice of surgical technique in the management of congenital cataract.
198147
5 200644
6 196325
7 199123
8 196422
9 196720
10 201919
11 202218
12 202414
13 197011
14 19636
15 19605
16 19635
17 19595
18
Single ventricle with rudimentary chamber. A case unrecognized at open cardiotomy.
19605
19 20224
20 19714

About Dan Taylor

Dan Taylor is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Nephrology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (9 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (2 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (2 papers) and Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (92 citations), Nephrology (90 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (178 citations), Ophthalmology (47 citations) and Genetics (153 citations). Dan Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Stenzel, Gilles Faury, Robert P. Mecham, Elise Davis, Mark T. Keating, D. Vérel, Shane M. Tibby, Andrew Durward, Anton Mayer and Sophie Skellett. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Anesthesia, Heart, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact