Dan Jiang

64 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Dan Jiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Sensory Systems 675
  • Developmental Biology 158
  • Otorhinolaryngology 283
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Speech and Hearing 194
Replace Patricia A. Leake with:
Patricia A. Leake United States
Jochen Tillein Germany
Stephen J. Rebscher United States
Jean K. Moore United States
Russell L. Snyder United States
Manuel Don United States
Chava Muchnik Israel
Minka Hildesheimer Israel
Göran Bredberg Sweden
Gerald R. Popelka United States
Dan Jiang relative to Patricia A. Leake United States Patricia A. Leake's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Patricia A. Leake · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Jiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Jiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Jiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Jiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Jiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Jiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Jiang. The network helps show where Dan Jiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Jiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Jiang Line = papers co-authored together Dan Jiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001337
2 201199
3 199877
4 200077
5 199671
6 199669
7 201268
8 200562
9 201562
10 201856
11 199654
12 201553
13 199750
14 201350
15 199745
16 200036
17 201335
18 201134
19 199931
20 199631

About Dan Jiang

Dan Jiang is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing and Neurology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (33 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (22 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (11 papers), Noise Effects and Management (7 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (675 citations), Developmental Biology (158 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (283 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations) and Speech and Hearing (194 citations). Dan Jiang has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alan R. Palmer, David McAlpine, Alec Fitzgerald O’Connor, Trevor M. Shackleton, Steve Connor, Nichola Callow, Martin Edwards, Mudit Jindal, David H. Marshall and Andrew Riskalla. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, Journal of Neurophysiology, Cochlear Implants International, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology and Acta Oto-Laryngologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact