Dan Healey
Impact in
- History top 2%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender Politics and Representation
Papers in
-
- European history and politics 14
- Soviet and Russian History 5
-
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 9
- Communism, Protests, Social Movements 2
- Co-authors
- Christopher Burton (1 shared paper)Francesca Stella (3 shared papers)Michael Khodarkovsky (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gender & History (3 papers)Slavic Review (2 papers)Cahiers du monde russe (2 papers)Journal of the History of Sexuality (2 papers)The Russian Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Dan Healey
17 papers receiving 193 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- History 84
- Gender Studies 63
- Political Science and International Relations 158
- Sociology and Political Science 185
- Social Psychology 58
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Healey
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Healey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Healey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Healey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Healey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Healey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Healey. The network helps show where Dan Healey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Dan Healey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homosexual Desire in Revolutionary Russia: The Regulation of Sexual and Gender Dissent | 2001 | 89 |
| 2 | 2001 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 27 | |
| 4 | Soviet Medicine: Culture, Practice, and Science | 2010 | 19 |
| 5 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 19 | Nasledie GULAGa: Prinuditel'nyi trud sovetskoi epokhi kak vnutrenniaia kolonizatsiia | 2012 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 1 |
About Dan Healey
Dan Healey is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, History and Philosophy of Science and Gender Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (14 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (9 papers), Soviet and Russian History (5 papers), German History and Society (4 papers), Medical History and Research (3 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers) and Communism, Protests, Social Movements (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (84 citations), Gender Studies (63 citations), Political Science and International Relations (158 citations), Sociology and Political Science (185 citations) and Social Psychology (58 citations). Dan Healey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Burton, Francesca Stella and Michael Khodarkovsky. Their work appears in journals such as Gender & History, Slavic Review, Cahiers du monde russe, Journal of the History of Sexuality and The Russian Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.