Dan Healey

773 citations
30 papers · 409 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Healey

21 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

Dan Healey
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Gender Studies 182
  • Political Science and International Relations 140
  • History 58
  • Sociology and Political Science 144
  • Social Psychology 54
Replace Gert Hekma with:
Gert Hekma Netherlands
Steven Maynard Canada
Randolph Trumbach United States
Matt Cook United Kingdom
Janet R. Jakobsen United States
Harriet Evans United Kingdom
Lynne Attwood United Kingdom
Mikael T. I. Nilsson Sweden
Regina Kunzel United States
Margaret Randall United States
Dan Healey relative to Gert Hekma Netherlands Gert Hekma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Gert Hekma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Healey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Healey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Healey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Healey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Healey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Healey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Healey. The network helps show where Dan Healey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Dan Healey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Healey Line = papers co-authored together Dan Healey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001145
2
Homosexual Desire in Revolutionary Russia: The Regulation of Sexual and Gender Dissent
200198
3 200241
4
Soviet Medicine: Culture, Practice, and Science
201022
5 200115
6
Bolshevik Sexual Forensics: Diagnosing Disorder in the Clinic and Courtroom, 1917-1939
200914
7 201014
8 20138
9 19937
10 20147
11 20157
12 20025
13 20125
14 20023
15 20033
16 20213
17 19972
18 20212
19 20011
20 20021

About Dan Healey

Dan Healey is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soviet and Russian History (26 papers), Gender and Feminist Studies (16 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (3 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (1 paper), Decadence, Literature, and Society (1 paper) and History of Science and Medicine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (182 citations), Political Science and International Relations (140 citations), History (58 citations), Sociology and Political Science (144 citations) and Social Psychology (54 citations). Dan Healey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Francesca Stella and Michael Khodarkovsky. Their work appears in journals such as Gender & History, Kritika, Cahiers du monde russe, Revolutionary Russia and GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact