Michael Khodarkovsky

681 citations
27 papers · 283 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Khodarkovsky

24 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers

Michael Khodarkovsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Classics 53
  • Anthropology 74
  • History 58
  • Political Science and International Relations 118
  • Sociology and Political Science 91
Replace James Grantham Turner with:
James Grantham Turner United States
Serhii Plokhy United States
Kate Fleet United Kingdom
Jerry Brotton United Kingdom
Gábor Ágoston United States
Sheridan Gilley United Kingdom
Sebouh David Aslanian United States
Caspar Hirschi Switzerland
Paul Monod United States
John M. Headley United States
Michael Khodarkovsky relative to James Grantham Turner United States James Grantham Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
James Grantham Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Khodarkovsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Khodarkovsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Khodarkovsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Khodarkovsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Khodarkovsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Khodarkovsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Khodarkovsky. The network helps show where Michael Khodarkovsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Michael Khodarkovsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Khodarkovsky Line = papers co-authored together Michael Khodarkovsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200668
2 199943
3 200238
4 199334
5 200617
6 199616
7 201110
8 20137
9 19987
10
New Era: How Garry Kasparov Changed the World of Chess
19975
11 19955
12 19945
13 19924
14 20184
15 20204
16 20093
17 19993
18 20072
19 20061
20 20061

About Michael Khodarkovsky

Michael Khodarkovsky is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Anthropology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soviet and Russian History (12 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), European Political History Analysis (3 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (2 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (2 papers) and Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (53 citations), Anthropology (74 citations), History (58 citations), Political Science and International Relations (118 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (91 citations). Michael Khodarkovsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James Forsyth, Nancy Shields Kollmann, Jonathan Shepard, Richard Hellie, Michael S. Flier, Denis J. B. Shaw, Simon Franklin, Christoph Μ. Schmidt, Janet Martin and Brian Davies. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Russian History, Ethnohistory, Ab imperio and Social History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact