Dan He

19 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Dan He
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Oncology 178
  • Cancer Research 62
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 31
  • Molecular Biology 226
  • Reproductive Medicine 21
Replace Li-Na Zhou with:
Li-Na Zhou China
Ge Lou China
Jie‐Hua He China
Malee Warnnissorn Thailand
Xiao-Qing Pei China
Л. А. Коломиец Russia
Marta Cañamero Spain
Loucia Kit Ying Chan Hong Kong
A. Hamilton United States
Vitor H. Almeida Brazil
Dan He relative to Li-Na Zhou China Li-Na Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Li-Na Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan He

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan He's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan He with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan He more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan He

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan He. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan He. The network helps show where Dan He may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan He, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan He Line = papers co-authored together Dan He links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Analysis of BRAF and N-RAS mutations in metastatic melanoma tissues.
2003170
2 199744
3 199728
4 201926
5 202025
6 201122
7 201720
8
[Expression and significance of Bmi-1 and Ki67 in colorectal carcinoma tissues].
200816
9 202112
10
The correlation of PTPN4 expression with prognosis in breast cancer.
20187
11 20136
12 20216
13 20235
14 20155
15 20184
16 19983
17 20203
18 20241
19 20251
20 20250

About Dan He

Dan He is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Galectins and Cancer Biology (2 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers) and Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (178 citations), Cancer Research (62 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (31 citations), Molecular Biology (226 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (21 citations). Dan He has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexis Gorden, David Polsky, Klaus J. Busam, Weiming Gai, Iman Osman, Alan N. Houghton, Weiqing Huang, Alfred K. Lam, Jian Zhao and Ying Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, European Polymer Journal, Gynecologic Oncology and Human Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact