Dan Gerling

5.4k citations
124 papers · 4.4k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Gerling

120 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Dan Gerling
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Insect Science 3.9k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.5k
  • Plant Science 2.3k
  • Horticulture 40
  • Genetics 629
Replace Robert F. Luck with:
Robert F. Luck United States
W. F. Tjallingii Netherlands
James R. Hagler United States
Allen Carson Cohen United States
Jonas Sandström Sweden
Thomas M. Perring United States
V. F. Eastop United Kingdom
L. R. Nault United States
Srinivas Kambhampati United States
Wolfgang Völkl Germany
Dan Gerling relative to Robert F. Luck United States Robert F. Luck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert F. Luck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Gerling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Gerling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Gerling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Gerling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Gerling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Gerling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Gerling. The network helps show where Dan Gerling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Gerling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Gerling Line = papers co-authored together Dan Gerling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001320
2
Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest status and management.
1990313
3 2006262
4 2013261
5 2007222
6 1989155
7 1990107
8 201486
9 200881
10 196871
11 198569
12 198469
13 197868
14 198067
15 198667
16 200166
17 199465
18 198262
19 196661
20 197461

About Dan Gerling

Dan Gerling is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 124 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (87 papers), Plant and animal studies (38 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (25 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (24 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (19 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (15 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (14 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (3.9k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.5k citations), Plant Science (2.3k citations), Horticulture (40 citations) and Genetics (629 citations). Dan Gerling has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Moshe Inbar, Judit Arnó, Òscar Alomar, A. Horowitz, Abraham Hefetz, H. H. W. Velthuis, E. F. Legner, Moshe Guershon, Henry R. Hermann and Tong‐Xian Liu. Their work appears in journals such as BioControl, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Environmental Entomology and Journal of Applied Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact