Dan Drew

1.2k citations
23 papers · 906 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Drew

23 papers receiving 734 citations

Peers

Dan Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Communication 596
  • Literature and Literary Theory 233
  • Sociology and Political Science 425
  • Gender Studies 81
  • Political Science and International Relations 198
Replace Charles F. Aust with:
Charles F. Aust United States
Joan Schleuder United States
Dave D'Alessio United States
Robert S. Cathcart United States
Kristen D. Landreville United States
Gerald Stone United States
Andrew L. Mendelson United States
Jody C Baumgartner United States
Barbara Warnick United States
Hanna Adoni Israel
Dan Drew relative to Charles F. Aust United States Charles F. Aust's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Charles F. Aust · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Drew. The network helps show where Dan Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Dan Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Drew Line = papers co-authored together Dan Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006141
2 1987107
3 200782
4 200174
5 199567
6 199064
7 199151
8 199847
9 199147
10 199038
11 199335
12 199127
13 198024
14 198019
15 198519
16 198417
17 197613
18 197212
19 19756
20 19866

About Dan Drew

Dan Drew is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations and Language and Linguistics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (10 papers), Social Media and Politics (8 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers), Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (2 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (596 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (233 citations), Sociology and Political Science (425 citations), Gender Studies (81 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (198 citations). Dan Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Weaver, Maria Elizabeth Grabe, Dolf Zillmann, Norbert Mundorf, Byron Reeves, Robert H. Wicks, James E. Weaver, Stephen D. Reese and G. Cleveland Wilhoit. Their work appears in journals such as Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Communication Research, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Journal of Advertising and Journalism Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact