Dan Clawson

3.0k citations
81 papers · 2.2k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Clawson

77 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Dan Clawson
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Public Administration 893
  • Strategy and Management 494
  • Gender Studies 235
  • Political Science and International Relations 627
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
Replace Sarosh Kuruvilla with:
Sarosh Kuruvilla United States
Sanford M. Jacoby United States
Harry C. Katz United States
Kirsten A. Grønbjerg United States
Paul K. Edwards United Kingdom
Paul Blyton United Kingdom
Richard Scase United Kingdom
Claus Schnabel Germany
Paul Marginson United Kingdom
Harvie Ramsay United Kingdom
Dan Clawson relative to Sarosh Kuruvilla United States Sarosh Kuruvilla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Sarosh Kuruvilla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Clawson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Clawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Clawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Clawson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Clawson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Clawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Clawson. The network helps show where Dan Clawson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Clawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Clawson Line = papers co-authored together Dan Clawson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003256
2 1993255
3 2003206
4 1999200
5 1989114
6 1981114
7 2018101
8 201493
9 198670
10 200765
11 198858
12 198853
13 201152
14 200147
15 200443
16 198129
17 199628
18 198428
19 200927
20 201527

About Dan Clawson

Dan Clawson is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (18 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (10 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (7 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (6 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (893 citations), Strategy and Management (494 citations), Gender Studies (235 citations), Political Science and International Relations (627 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.1k citations). Dan Clawson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Naomi Gerstel, Mark S. Mizruchi, Alan Neustadtl, Mary Ann Clawson, Paul Goldman, Robert Zussman, Rick Fantasia, John Scott, Verta Taylor and Theda Skocpol. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Journal of Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations Review and Social Forces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact