Dan Beck

625 citations
19 papers · 511 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Beck

17 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Dan Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Reproductive Medicine 260
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 114
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 17
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 45
  • Genetics 54
Replace James E. Hunter with:
James E. Hunter United States
Un Suk Jung South Korea
Gérard L. Bremer Netherlands
Kazuhiro Yamauchi Japan
Mohamed Laban Egypt
Benedetta Guani Switzerland
Pingping Li China
Francesca Buonomo Italy
Hyeong In Ha South Korea
Toshihiko Hayashi Japan
Dan Beck relative to James E. Hunter United States James E. Hunter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
James E. Hunter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Beck. The network helps show where Dan Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Beck Line = papers co-authored together Dan Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1992131
2 199994
3 198655
4 200547
5 199335
6 199323
7 200022
8 197719
9 200018
10
Reducing malignant ascites accumulation by repeated intraperitoneal administrations of a Viscum album extract.
200618
11 200515
12 200110
13 20049
14 19958
15 20044
16 20222
17 19931
18 20100
19 20100

About Dan Beck

Dan Beck is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Genetics, Surgery and Rheumatology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (8 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (2 papers), Teratomas and Epidermoid Cysts (2 papers), Omental and Epiploic Conditions (1 paper) and Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (260 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (114 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (17 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (45 citations) and Genetics (54 citations). Dan Beck has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph M. Brandes, Shraga Rottem, Israel Thaler, Z. Weiner, Ruth Gershoni‐Baruch, Hai Shan Wu, Liane Deligdisch, Hedviga Kerner, Joan Gil and Abraham Kuten. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, Cancer, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact