Dag Hoem
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Anders Molven (17 shared papers)Georg Dimcevski (6 shared papers)Odd Helge Gilja (4 shared papers)Spiros Kotopoulis (2 shared papers)Heike Immervoll (8 shared papers)Michiel Postema (3 shared papers)Asgaut Viste (10 shared papers)Åke Andrén‐Sandberg (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Pancreatology (3 papers)Annals of Oncology (3 papers)Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (3 papers)BMC Surgery (2 papers)Pancreas (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NorwayUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Dag Hoem
37 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Dag Hoem's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Oncology 515
- Surgery 458
- Biomedical Engineering 494
- Cancer Research 132
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 209
Countries citing papers authored by Dag Hoem
This map shows the geographic impact of Dag Hoem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dag Hoem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dag Hoem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dag Hoem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dag Hoem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dag Hoem. The network helps show where Dag Hoem may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dag Hoem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A human clinical trial using ultrasound and microbubbles to enhance gemcitabine treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 365 |
| 2 | 2013 | 188 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 175 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 96 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 80 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 78 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 74 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 74 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 19 | Survival and an overview of decision-making in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. | 2008 | 20 |
| 20 | 2019 | 19 |
About Dag Hoem
Dag Hoem is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (13 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (6 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (5 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (5 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (4 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (3 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (2 papers) and Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (515 citations), Surgery (458 citations), Biomedical Engineering (494 citations), Cancer Research (132 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (209 citations). Dag Hoem has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Anders Molven, Georg Dimcevski, Odd Helge Gilja, Spiros Kotopoulis, Heike Immervoll, Michiel Postema, Asgaut Viste, Åke Andrén‐Sandberg, Halfdan Sørbye and Per Øystein Sakariassen. Their work appears in journals such as Pancreatology, Annals of Oncology, Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, BMC Surgery and Pancreas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.