D. Steck

2.8k citations
56 papers · 2.0k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

D. Steck

50 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

D. Steck
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 674
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 529
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 18
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 203
Replace M. C. Nemes with:
M. C. Nemes Brazil
Joseph Samuel India
Sarben Sarkar United Kingdom
L. M. Simmons United States
M. Razavy Canada
Humberto Michinel Spain
W.H. Oskay United States
S. V. Lawande India
Pierre Cladé France
Zofia Białynicka-Birula Poland
D. Steck relative to M. C. Nemes Brazil M. C. Nemes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. C. Nemes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Steck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Steck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Steck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Steck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Steck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Steck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Steck. The network helps show where D. Steck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Steck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Steck Line = papers co-authored together D. Steck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001273
2
Rubidium 85 D Line Data
2003205
3 1985170
4 1984130
5 1998128
6
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
2001127
7 200481
8 199865
9 200864
10 198562
11 200060
12 200057
13 200251
14 198538
15 200037
16 200134
17
Sodium D Line Data
200333
18 201232
19 198532
20 200232

About D. Steck

D. Steck is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (22 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (16 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (13 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (12 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (11 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers) and Neutrino Physics Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (674 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (529 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (18 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (203 citations). D. Steck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include W.H. Oskay, Mark G. Raizen, B.G. Klappauf, G. L. Cassiday, E. C. Loh, J. W. Elbert, R. M. Baltrusaitis, P. R. Gerhardy, P. Sokolsky and Valery Milner. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal, Physical Review A, Review of Scientific Instruments and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact