D. M. Sether
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Research on scale insects
Papers in
-
- Plant Virus Research Studies 29
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies 8
- Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens 6
- Nematode management and characterization studies 4
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 15
- Co-authors
- John Hu (26 shared papers)Michael J. Melzer (19 shared papers)Wayne B. Borth (16 shared papers)Diane E. Ullman (6 shared papers)Philippe A. Rossignol (2 shared papers)Alexander V. Karasev (4 shared papers)Wenshuang Xie (2 shared papers)Francis Zee (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Plant Disease (12 papers)Phytopathology (4 papers)Virus Genes (3 papers)Plant Pathology (1 paper)Annals of Applied Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandChina
In The Last Decade
D. M. Sether
38 papers receiving 832 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Endocrinology 232
- Insect Science 488
- Plant Science 852
- Horticulture 21
- Biotechnology 42
Countries citing papers authored by D. M. Sether
This map shows the geographic impact of D. M. Sether's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. M. Sether with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. M. Sether more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. M. Sether
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. M. Sether. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. M. Sether. The network helps show where D. M. Sether may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. M. Sether, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 100 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 59 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 58 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 42 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 39 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 35 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 16 |
About D. M. Sether
D. M. Sether is a scholar working on Plant Science, Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology and Forestry, having authored 38 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (29 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (15 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (10 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (9 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (8 papers), Pineapple and bromelain studies (7 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (6 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (232 citations), Insect Science (488 citations), Plant Science (852 citations), Horticulture (21 citations) and Biotechnology (42 citations). D. M. Sether has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and China. Frequent co-authors include John Hu, Michael J. Melzer, Wayne B. Borth, Diane E. Ullman, Philippe A. Rossignol, Alexander V. Karasev, Wenshuang Xie, Francis Zee, Stephen A. Ferreira and Dennis Gonsalves. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Disease, Phytopathology, Virus Genes, Plant Pathology and Annals of Applied Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.