D. G. Pyatt

25 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

D. G. Pyatt
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 273
  • Soil Science 157
  • Environmental Chemistry 109
  • Ecology 273
  • Global and Planetary Change 216
Replace D. J. Pluth with:
D. J. Pluth Canada
Björn Hånell Sweden
Richard L. Fredriksen United States
Margaret R. Gale United States
Jeffrey J. Lee United States
Lewis F. Ohmann United States
Hal O. Liechty United States
Marty Siltanen Canada
PM Attiwill
Folke O. Andersson Sweden
D. G. Pyatt relative to D. J. Pluth Canada D. J. Pluth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
D. J. Pluth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. G. Pyatt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. G. Pyatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. G. Pyatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. G. Pyatt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. G. Pyatt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. G. Pyatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. G. Pyatt. The network helps show where D. G. Pyatt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside D. G. Pyatt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. G. Pyatt Line = papers co-authored together D. G. Pyatt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993119
2
An Ecological Site Classification for Forestry in Great Britain
2001108
3 200170
4 199766
5 198733
6 198925
7 198625
8 198625
9
An Ecological Site Classification for Forestry in Great Britain with Special Reference to Grampian, Scotland
199724
10 200523
11 197821
12
Soil groups of upland forests.
197018
13 198316
14 198413
15 198512
16 199712
17 199011
18 19798
19 19977
20
Long term prospects for forests on peatland.
19905

About D. G. Pyatt

D. G. Pyatt is a scholar working on Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science, Plant Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 25 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (11 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (9 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (4 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (273 citations), Soil Science (157 citations), Environmental Chemistry (109 citations), Ecology (273 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (216 citations). D. G. Pyatt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include M. G. R. Cannell, Roderick C. Dewar, Andrew R. Anderson, Ian White, D. C. Malcolm, T. Connolly, Keith A. Smith, Juan Carlos Pinilla Suárez, B. L. Williams and J. M. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Soil Use and Management, Journal of Hydrology and Biodiversity and Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact