D. E. Carden

2.0k citations
51 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

D. E. Carden

47 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

D. E. Carden
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 855
  • Ophthalmology 214
  • Biochemistry 117
  • Sensory Systems 80
  • Social Psychology 231
Replace Dirk van Norren with:
Dirk van Norren Netherlands
Elizabeth Sumi Yamada Brazil
Annette E. Allen United Kingdom
T.D. Lamb United Kingdom
Franck P. Martial United Kingdom
P.L. Marchiafava Italy
Yifeng Zhou China
John M. Mendenhall United States
Robert J. Schafer United States
Juan M Angueyra United States
D. E. Carden relative to Dirk van Norren Netherlands Dirk van Norren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dirk van Norren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. E. Carden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. E. Carden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. E. Carden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. E. Carden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. E. Carden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. E. Carden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. E. Carden. The network helps show where D. E. Carden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. E. Carden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. E. Carden Line = papers co-authored together D. E. Carden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976394
2 2003266
3
Human Visual Evoked-Potentials to Chromatic and Achromatic Gratings
1987109
4 198598
5 201396
6 199388
7 200984
8 198060
9 199255
10 197448
11 199245
12 200136
13 200932
14
Human Occipital Potentials-Evoked by the Onset of Equiluminant Chromatic Gratings
198525
15 200923
16 200822
17 197921
18 201819
19 199418
20 200217

About D. E. Carden

D. E. Carden is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers), Color Science and Applications (9 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers), Color perception and design (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (3 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (855 citations), Ophthalmology (214 citations), Biochemistry (117 citations), Sensory Systems (80 citations) and Social Psychology (231 citations). D. E. Carden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include P. Ewen King‐Smith, J. J. Kulikowski, Ian J. Murray, Tony Miller, S.R. Butler, David J. Walker, T. J. Flowers, Vincent Walsh, Neil R. A. Parry and Rob L. P. van der Veen. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Behavioural Brain Research, The Journal of Physiology and Perception.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact