D. E. Carden

2.0k citations
50 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

D. E. Carden

44 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

D. E. Carden
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 767
  • Ophthalmology 200
  • Biochemistry 107
  • Sensory Systems 69
  • Social Psychology 214
Replace Annette E. Allen with:
Annette E. Allen United Kingdom
T.D. Lamb United Kingdom
Franck P. Martial United Kingdom
Carl J. Bassi United States
P.L. Marchiafava Italy
Yifeng Zhou China
Robert J. Schafer United States
Juan M Angueyra United States
Samar Mehta United States
Hyung‐Cheul Shin South Korea
D. E. Carden relative to Annette E. Allen United Kingdom Annette E. Allen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Annette E. Allen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. E. Carden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. E. Carden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. E. Carden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. E. Carden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. E. Carden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. E. Carden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. E. Carden. The network helps show where D. E. Carden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. E. Carden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. E. Carden Line = papers co-authored together D. E. Carden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976364
2 2003239
3
Human Visual Evoked-Potentials to Chromatic and Achromatic Gratings
198798
4 201394
5 198582
6 200978
7 199376
8 198055
9 199252
10 199242
11 197440
12 200133
13 200931
14 200922
15 197920
16
Human Occipital Potentials-Evoked by the Onset of Equiluminant Chromatic Gratings
198519
17 200819
18 201819
19 200216
20 199415

About D. E. Carden

D. E. Carden is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers), Color Science and Applications (9 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Color perception and design (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (3 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (767 citations), Ophthalmology (200 citations), Biochemistry (107 citations), Sensory Systems (69 citations) and Social Psychology (214 citations). D. E. Carden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include P. Ewen King‐Smith, J. J. Kulikowski, Ian J. Murray, Tony Miller, S.R. Butler, David J. Walker, T. J. Flowers, Vincent Walsh, Neil R. A. Parry and Tos T. J. M. Berendschot. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Behavioural Brain Research, Journal of Experimental Botany and The Journal of Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact