D. Croft

26 papers receiving 823 citations

Peers

D. Croft
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 602
  • Radiation 170
  • Aerospace Engineering 259
  • Materials Chemistry 394
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 131
Replace E. Łaszyńska with:
E. Łaszyńska United Kingdom
Gediminas Stankūnas Lithuania
G. Kaveney United Kingdom
Willem Leysen Belgium
Nick Balshaw United Kingdom
E. Veshchev France
G. Hermon United Kingdom
V.S. Neverov Russia
Jan Dankowski Poland
José Maurício Ribeiro Figueiredo United Kingdom
D. Croft relative to E. Łaszyńska United Kingdom E. Łaszyńska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
E. Łaszyńska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Croft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Croft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Croft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Croft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Croft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Croft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Croft. The network helps show where D. Croft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Croft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Croft Line = papers co-authored together D. Croft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017162
2 2022116
3 201994
4 202280
5 202467
6 202260
7 198638
8 201634
9 201727
10 201826
11 201624
12 202419
13 201716
14 202014
15 202111
16 202310
17 20169
18 20148
19 20248
20 20237

About D. Croft

D. Croft is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation, Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Geophysics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (17 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (10 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (10 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (3 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (3 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (2 papers) and Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (602 citations), Radiation (170 citations), Aerospace Engineering (259 citations), Materials Chemistry (394 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (131 citations). D. Croft has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paola Batistoni, Nicolas Bekris Dr., Miroslav Z. Papiz, Philip R. Moore, John Richard Helliwell, Andrew Thompson, Emmanuel Pantos, N. W. Harris, Ian D. Glover and Jarjis Habash. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion and Nature Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact