D. C. Redding

2k citations
33 papers · 1.6k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

D. C. Redding

32 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

D. C. Redding
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.4k
  • Instrumentation 9
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 44
  • Aerospace Engineering 61
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 70
Replace J. Chapsky with:
J. Chapsky United States
F. Asiri United States
Jan Soucek France
Andrew Walsh United Kingdom
H. Lamy Belgium
C. C. Harvey France
Jennifer E. Logan United Kingdom
A. Perraca United States
Holly Gilbert United States
U. Weiland Germany
D. C. Redding relative to J. Chapsky United States J. Chapsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
J. Chapsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. C. Redding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. C. Redding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. C. Redding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. C. Redding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. C. Redding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. C. Redding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. C. Redding. The network helps show where D. C. Redding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside D. C. Redding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. C. Redding Line = papers co-authored together D. C. Redding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003266
2 2004169
3 2004154
4 2005126
5 2005105
6 2004100
7 200492
8 200587
9 200583
10 200683
11 200574
12 200561
13 200552
14 200642
15 199018
16 198713
17 201211
18 19868
19 20048
20
When is it Worth Assembling Observatories in Space
20198

About D. C. Redding

D. C. Redding is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation and Ocean Engineering, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (17 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (7 papers), Spacecraft Dynamics and Control (5 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (2 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (1 paper), earthquake and tectonic studies (1 paper), Space exploration and regulation (1 paper) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.4k citations), Instrumentation (9 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (44 citations), Aerospace Engineering (61 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (70 citations). D. C. Redding has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andreas H. von Flotow, Darryll J. Pines, Jean‐Paul Ampuero, Andrew E. Lowman, Rémi Michel, Edward V. Bergmann, Jean‐Philippe Avouac, N. Lapusta, S. Leprince and Scott A. Basinger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physical Review Letters and Applied Physics B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact