D. Bica

33 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

D. Bica
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Biomedical Engineering 533
  • Physiology 47
  • Biomaterials 92
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 109
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 80
Replace K. Skeff Neto with:
K. Skeff Neto Brazil
Andrzej Skumiel Poland
T. Hornowski Poland
C.N. Marin Romania
Iosif Mălăescu Romania
Anna Spanoudaki Greece
G. Noyel France
Inga Ennen Germany
José Rafael Bordin Brazil
Diego Alba Venero United Kingdom
D. Bica relative to K. Skeff Neto Brazil K. Skeff Neto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
K. Skeff Neto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Bica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Bica's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Bica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Bica more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Bica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Bica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Bica. The network helps show where D. Bica may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Bica, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Bica Line = papers co-authored together D. Bica links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200877
2 200953
3 200652
4 200947
5 200544
6 200342
7 199940
8 200323
9 200522
10 200821
11 200221
12 201020
13 200718
14 199918
15 199917
16
200217
17 200216
18 200716
19 200314
20 200214

About D. Bica

D. Bica is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Condensed Matter Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Physiology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 689 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (25 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (8 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (7 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers), Iron oxide chemistry and applications (3 papers), Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects (3 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers) and Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (533 citations), Physiology (47 citations), Biomaterials (92 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (109 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (80 citations). D. Bica has collaborated with scholars based in Romania, Russia and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include L. Vékás, М. В. Авдеев, В. Л. Аксенов, M. Bălăşoiu, Etelka Tombácz, Erzsébet Illés, M. Raşa, L. Rosta, Andrea Majzik and Gy. Török. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, The European Physical Journal E, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter and Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact