Cynthia Rush

732 citations
35 papers · 440 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Cynthia Rush

31 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Cynthia Rush
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Computational Mathematics 6
  • Computer Networks and Communications 199
  • Computational Mechanics 172
  • Statistics and Probability 54
  • Signal Processing 71
Replace Jean Barbier with:
Jean Barbier Italy
E.G. Kanterakis United States
Yash Deshpande Germany
Anu Huttunen Finland
K. Järvinen Finland
Sina Jafarpour United States
Andre Manoel France
Roberto Pagliari United States
Praveen Kaligineedi Canada
Cynthia Rush relative to Jean Barbier Italy Jean Barbier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jean Barbier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cynthia Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cynthia Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cynthia Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cynthia Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cynthia Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cynthia Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cynthia Rush. The network helps show where Cynthia Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Cynthia Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cynthia Rush Line = papers co-authored together Cynthia Rush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201772
2 202164
3 202243
4 201634
5 201830
6 202127
7 201614
8 201814
9 201513
10 201912
11 201012
12 201812
13 201911
14 20169
15 20178
16 20178
17 20177
18 20196
19 20206
20 20225

About Cynthia Rush

Cynthia Rush is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistics and Probability and Signal Processing, having authored 35 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (17 papers), Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms (9 papers), Cooperative Communication and Network Coding (9 papers), Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization (8 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (7 papers), Wireless Communication Security Techniques (6 papers), Error Correcting Code Techniques (5 papers) and Statistical Methods and Inference (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (6 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (199 citations), Computational Mechanics (172 citations), Statistics and Probability (54 citations) and Signal Processing (71 citations). Cynthia Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Ramji Venkataramanan, Dror Baron, Vamsi K. Amalladinne, Jean‐François Chamberland, Asit Kumar Pradhan, Krishna R. Narayanan, Richard J. Samworth, Yanting Ma, Seth Leon and Bruce E. Wexler. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, The Annals of Statistics and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact