C.W. Pitt

2.1k citations
73 papers · 1.7k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

C.W. Pitt

71 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

C.W. Pitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Materials Chemistry 1.1k
  • Ceramics and Composites 124
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.2k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 516
  • Biomedical Engineering 619
Replace Masataka Hirose with:
Masataka Hirose Japan
L. Rebohle Germany
Th.J.A. Popma Netherlands
T. Wágner Germany
Azzedine Boudrioua France
K. Murakami Japan
H. Fröb Germany
T. Sorsch United States
H. Vinzelberg Germany
J. E. Gerbi United States
C.W. Pitt relative to Masataka Hirose Japan Masataka Hirose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Masataka Hirose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.W. Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.W. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.W. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.W. Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.W. Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.W. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.W. Pitt. The network helps show where C.W. Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.W. Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.W. Pitt Line = papers co-authored together C.W. Pitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994185
2 1996182
3 1998158
4 2002142
5 1999109
6 1985106
7 198069
8 199848
9 200042
10 198341
11 199732
12 197631
13 198829
14 197229
15 198124
16 200124
17 198823
18 199822
19 198821
20 197521

About C.W. Pitt

C.W. Pitt is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (30 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (20 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (16 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (11 papers), Optical Coatings and Gratings (9 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (8 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (8 papers) and Photonic Crystals and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations), Ceramics and Composites (124 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (516 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (619 citations). C.W. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Anthony J. Kenyon, P.F. Trwoga, C.E. Chryssou, L. M. Walpita, D.E. Hole, M. Federighi, Tsutomu Shimizu-Iwayama, Fabrizio Di Pasquale, F. Gfeller and Nikhil Sharma. Their work appears in journals such as Electronics Letters, Thin Solid Films, Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters and Materials Science and Engineering B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact