C.S.J. Pickles

801 citations
33 papers · 674 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

C.S.J. Pickles

33 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers

C.S.J. Pickles
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Ecological Modeling 74
  • Materials Chemistry 480
  • Mechanics of Materials 211
  • Ceramics and Composites 43
  • Computational Mechanics 142
Replace A. W. Phelps with:
A. W. Phelps United States
D. Loison France
L.R. Zhao Canada
Ramathasan Thevamaran United States
Christopher J. H. Wort United Kingdom
Akihito Matsumuro Japan
R. W. Rohde United States
Fabienne Grégori France
Marie-Hélène Nadal France
R. E. Schramm United States
C.S.J. Pickles relative to A. W. Phelps United States A. W. Phelps's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
A. W. Phelps · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.S.J. Pickles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.S.J. Pickles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.S.J. Pickles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.S.J. Pickles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.S.J. Pickles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.S.J. Pickles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.S.J. Pickles. The network helps show where C.S.J. Pickles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.S.J. Pickles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.S.J. Pickles Line = papers co-authored together C.S.J. Pickles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996106
2 200177
3 199956
4 200046
5 199829
6 200228
7 199627
8 200323
9 200022
10 199520
11 199719
12 199919
13 199017
14 200117
15 199416
16 200116
17 200015
18 199614
19 199811
20 199211

About C.S.J. Pickles

C.S.J. Pickles is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Geophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (21 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (8 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (7 papers), Erosion and Abrasive Machining (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (5 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (4 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (4 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (74 citations), Materials Chemistry (480 citations), Mechanics of Materials (211 citations), Ceramics and Composites (43 citations) and Computational Mechanics (142 citations). C.S.J. Pickles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include J. E. Field, R.S. Sussmann, Christopher J. H. Wort, Steven E. Coe, C. E. Hall, Daniel J. Twitchen, Keith L. Lewis, M. Cardona, T. Ruf and H.‐J. Fecht. Their work appears in journals such as Diamond and Related Materials, Wear, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics and Journal of Fluids Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact