Craig E. Geist

29 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Craig E. Geist
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Ophthalmology 69
  • Developmental Biology 12
  • Pharmaceutical Science 23
  • Parasitology 22
  • Neurology 45
Replace Joseph Pemberton with:
Joseph Pemberton United Kingdom
Peggy P. Han United States
Jack L. Weiss United States
Celia R. Valverde United States
Hiroyoshi NINOMIYA Japan
David W. Friedman United States
David L. Yarian United States
Pierre‐François Isard France
Thomas Dulaurent France
Beth C. Case United States
Craig E. Geist relative to Joseph Pemberton United Kingdom Joseph Pemberton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Joseph Pemberton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig E. Geist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig E. Geist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig E. Geist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig E. Geist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig E. Geist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig E. Geist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig E. Geist. The network helps show where Craig E. Geist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Craig E. Geist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Craig E. Geist Line = papers co-authored together Craig E. Geist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200580
2 201343
3 200435
4 201433
5 201532
6 200729
7 200128
8 200724
9 199919
10 200719
11 200517
12 200514
13 201213
14 200712
15 202112
16 19919
17 20079
18 20068
19 20087
20 20225

About Craig E. Geist

Craig E. Geist is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Dermatology, Neurology, Biophysics and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (2 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (2 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (2 papers) and Ocular Oncology and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (69 citations), Developmental Biology (12 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (23 citations), Parasitology (22 citations) and Neurology (45 citations). Craig E. Geist has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Vesna Zderic, Sankaranarayana P. Mahesh, Petros Euthymiou Carvounis, Stephen B. Libby, Daniel T. Blumstein, Hetal Patel, Ji Liu, Neil Tanna, Saša Janjanin and Arjun S. Joshi. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ophthalmology, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Seminars in Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact