Craig E. Geist

25 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Craig E. Geist
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Ophthalmology 53
  • Developmental Biology 12
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Pharmaceutical Science 26
  • Biophysics 17
Replace David Friedman with:
David Friedman United States
Jack L. Weiss United States
Thomas R. Gest United States
P.L.A. Bill South Africa
Yoichi Inoue Japan
Sudarshan Khokhar India
J. C. Austin South Africa
David L. Yarian United States
Wesley P. Thayer United States
F Nürnberger Germany
Craig E. Geist relative to David Friedman United States David Friedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
David Friedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig E. Geist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig E. Geist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig E. Geist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig E. Geist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig E. Geist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig E. Geist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig E. Geist. The network helps show where Craig E. Geist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Craig E. Geist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Craig E. Geist Line = papers co-authored together Craig E. Geist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200573
2 201339
3 201530
4 201427
5 200425
6 200720
7 200118
8 200516
9 199915
10 201212
11 200512
12 200711
13 202111
14 19919
15 20078
16 20067
17 20086
18 20105
19 20225
20 20152

About Craig E. Geist

Craig E. Geist is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Dermatology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (3 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (3 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (3 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (2 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (2 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (53 citations), Developmental Biology (12 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (26 citations) and Biophysics (17 citations). Craig E. Geist has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Qatar and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vesna Zderic, Sankaranarayana P. Mahesh, Stephen B. Libby, Daniel T. Blumstein, Petros Carvounis, Hetal Patel, Ji Liu, Ronald Levy, C. Wesley Lindsey and David T. Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Seminars in Ophthalmology, Medical Physics and Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact