Corwin H. Booth

7.4k citations
189 papers · 6.2k · h-index 45

Impact in

Papers in

Corwin H. Booth

187 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Corwin H. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Condensed Matter Physics 2.4k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 2.6k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 1.8k
  • Ceramics and Composites 477
  • Materials Chemistry 3.0k
Replace V. Petřı́ček with:
V. Petřı́ček Czechia
H. Fueß Germany
Steven D. Conradson United States
B. Morosin United States
R.M. Ibberson United Kingdom
L. Soderholm United States
David K. Shuh United States
G. Vaughan France
David A. Keen United Kingdom
Kevin S. Knight United Kingdom
Corwin H. Booth relative to V. Petřı́ček Czechia V. Petřı́ček's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
V. Petřı́ček · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Corwin H. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Corwin H. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corwin H. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corwin H. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Corwin H. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Corwin H. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Corwin H. Booth. The network helps show where Corwin H. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Corwin H. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Corwin H. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Corwin H. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 189 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998207
2 1995200
3 1997148
4 1994141
5 2001139
6 2007131
7 1997130
8 2009129
9 2005125
10 2005124
11 1999124
12 1998123
13 2017121
14 2009117
15 1997100
16 201898
17 201096
18 201295
19 200292
20 200191

About Corwin H. Booth

Corwin H. Booth is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 189 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (64 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (43 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (39 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (31 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (28 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (27 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (20 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (2.4k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (2.6k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (1.8k citations), Ceramics and Composites (477 citations) and Materials Chemistry (3.0k citations). Corwin H. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include F. Bridges, Richard A. Andersen, G. H. Kwei, J. M. Lawrence, Wayne W. Lukens, David K. Shuh, Andrew Cornelius, Marc D. Walter, J. J. Neumeier and Laurent Maron. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physical Review B, Inorganic Chemistry, Physical Review Letters and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact