Cornelia Drees

1.2k citations
43 papers · 718 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Cornelia Drees

40 papers receiving 688 citations

Peers

Cornelia Drees
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 337
  • Neurology 172
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 155
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 133
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 143
Replace Marian Galovic with:
Marian Galovic Switzerland
Gregory O. Walsh United States
Zelko Matkovic Australia
Paloma Pulido Spain
Annkathrin Poepel Germany
Dieter Wenzel Germany
Sepehr Sani United States
Martin Kirkpatrick United Kingdom
Takayasu Tottori Japan
Carolyn Pizoli United States
Cornelia Drees relative to Marian Galovic Switzerland Marian Galovic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Marian Galovic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cornelia Drees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cornelia Drees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cornelia Drees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cornelia Drees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cornelia Drees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cornelia Drees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cornelia Drees. The network helps show where Cornelia Drees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cornelia Drees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cornelia Drees Line = papers co-authored together Cornelia Drees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202090
2 200778
3 200878
4 200876
5 201259
6 201133
7 202030
8 202028
9 202125
10 201724
11 201722
12 201722
13 199918
14 201614
15 202212
16 202112
17 201711
18 202010
19 200210
20 20217

About Cornelia Drees

Cornelia Drees is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 718 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (18 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (7 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (337 citations), Neurology (172 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (155 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (133 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (143 citations). Cornelia Drees has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Rama Maganti, John Kerrigan, Paula Gerber, Steve S. Chung, Kevin Chapman, Erin Prenger, Harold L. Rekate, Steven Ojemann, John A. Thompson and Mesha‐Gay Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsy & Behavior, Neurology, Epilepsia, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery and Journal of neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact