Cornelia Caspari

462 citations
9 papers · 367 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Cornelia Caspari

6 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Cornelia Caspari
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • General Health Professions 228
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 58
  • Family Practice 3
  • Philosophy 12
  • Pharmacy 4
Replace Marie Ménoret with:
Marie Ménoret France
Tim Rawcliffe United Kingdom
Valerie Oglov Canada
Marlaine Figueroa Gray United States
Jean‐Christophe Mino France
Ali Zargham‐Boroujeni Iran
Allison LaRussa United States
Alessandra Colaianni United States
Anna Löfgren Sweden
Leah Z. Rand United States
Cornelia Caspari relative to Marie Ménoret France Marie Ménoret's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Marie Ménoret · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cornelia Caspari

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cornelia Caspari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cornelia Caspari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cornelia Caspari more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cornelia Caspari

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cornelia Caspari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cornelia Caspari. The network helps show where Cornelia Caspari may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Cornelia Caspari, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cornelia Caspari Line = papers co-authored together Cornelia Caspari links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2006149
2 2007123
3 200959
4 201130
5 20032
6 20211
7 20221
8 20211
9 20211

About Cornelia Caspari

Cornelia Caspari is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (1 paper), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (1 paper) and Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (228 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (58 citations), Family Practice (3 citations), Philosophy (12 citations) and Pharmacy (4 citations). Cornelia Caspari has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Vodermaier, Claudia Spies, Martin Christian Härter, Bruno Neuner, Andreas Loh, Michael Untch, Nina Ditsch, Daniela Simón, Tanja Krones and Adrian Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, British Journal of Cancer, Health Psychology, Health Expectations and Das Gesundheitswesen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact